Join our Mailing List

"As long as human rights are violated, there can be no foundation for peace. How can peace grow where speaking the truth is itself a crime?"

Few Chinese presidents ever visited Tibet in five decades

July 21, 2008

By Pranay Sharma

Beijing, July 20,2008 (IANS) Tibet may well be an “inalienable” part of
the People’s Republic of China, but few Chinese presidents or its
paramount leaders have ever visited the region in the past five decades.
Tibet forms a large part of the total landmass of China and has remained
in the international focus for the Dalai Lama and his supporters’ demand
for “greater autonomy.” But Chinese officials cannot say for sure when
was the last time a Chinese president visited Tibet.

During the inaugural run of the Xining-Lhasa train last year, President
Hu Jintao had visited Qinghai, which originally was part of Tibet but
does not fall within the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR).

“It is not possible for the president to visit every province of China,”
Dong Yunhu, director general of the state council information office
said, some what embarrassed at being asked to comment on this unusual fact.

“According to my knowledge at least one senior leader visits Tibet every
year,” he added.

Chinese emperors in the past have tried to exercise their control over
Tibet either through proxies or alliances. This tradition seems to have
continued even after the communist take over of the country in 1949 and
that of Tibet a decade later.

Neither Mao Tse Dong nor Deng Xiao Ping - the two paramount leaders of
China had ever visited Tibet. Hu Yaobang had visited Lhasa in 1980 when
he was the general secretary of the Communist Party of China. Jiang
Zemin had also been to Tibet in 1990 but this was before he became the
president of China.

Importantly, during the visits by Hu Yaobang and Jiang Deng was alive,
and irrespective of the posts held by others, he was considered to be
the paramount leader of China.

Hu Jintao, the current president of the country was in charge of Tibet
affairs for some years. But he has not visited the TAR since he became
the president of China in 2003.

“For centuries different dynasties have made special policies for
Tibet,” Dong said. He explained that because of the difficult terrain
and “lack of oxygen” at the high altitude many top leaders of China find
it difficult to visit Lhasa.

Many western scholars, particularly those sympathetic to the Dalai Lama,
have been critical of this policy of the Chinese leadership.

“The rulers of empires are rarely interested in those they rule, they
administer and deal with them, trying to project a sense of permanence,
but find their subjects frustrating and ungrateful,” English scholar
Patrick French wrote in his book, “Tibet, Tibet: a personal history of a
lost land”.

But one of the reasons for Beijing to maintain a “hands-off” policy in
dealing with Tibet may be part of what Hu Yaobang, regarded by many as a
progressive reformer, tried to establish. During his visit to Lhasa in
1980 he had convinced his party colleagues to withdraw the Han Chinese
cadres from Tibet and leave its general administration to Tibetan
leaders of the party.

Despite propaganda and allegations of large-scale resettlement of Han
Chinese in the area, the population of the TAR has more than 80 percent
Tibetans and most of the key administrative positions are held by
Tibetans. But the party secretary dealing with Tibet is usually a Han
Chinese and there is also a substantial presence of the Han-dominated
People’s Liberation Army in the region to deal with any possible trouble.

However, the fact that the lack of a Chinese presidential visit to the
region was becoming an embarrassing question to tackle became evident
from the answer of the state council information office’s director general.

“I believe it will be the agenda of the top leaders to visit Tibet,”
Dong told some visiting Indian journalists.
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665
Developed by plank