Join our Mailing List

"For a happier, more stable and civilized future, each of us must develop a sincere, warm-hearted feeling of brotherhood and sisterhood."

Editorial: A no-policy policy

November 12, 2007

Hindustan Times

November 06, 2007

When it comes to the ‘Roof of the World’, India’s policies are timeless.
Or so New Delhi would have us believe, the way it continues to waffle
over its policy — or rather the lack of one — on Tibet. It is
unfortunate that the government should have asked Union ministers to
stay away from a function in the capital last Saturday to felicitate
Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. Even Delhi Chief Minister
Sheila Dikshit, who reportedly confirmed her participation earlier,
stood the Dalai Lama up, saying that she had to rush to Mumbai. This was
not totally unexpected, given India’s wont to scrupulously avoid such
ceremonies, so as not to be seen getting tangled in a war of diplomacy
against China.

Beijing is so touchy about Tibet that New Delhi always kept a discreet
distance from the Dalai Lama, whom China accuses of pursing a political
campaign for an independent Tibet. Never mind if the spiritual leader —
who has been in exile in India ever since Chinese forces seized Tibet in
1959 — of late has said that he merely wants greater autonomy for the
region. The Tibetan Prime Minister-in-exile, Samdhong Rinpoche, echoed
this recently when he asked Tibetans and Tibet support groups around the
world to restrain from protesting against visiting Chinese dignitaries.
It is an open secret that China’s ruthless suppression of protests has
led to the deaths of an estimated 1.4 million Tibetans. Beijing is
forever trying to attract immigrants from the Chinese Han majority
ethnic group to Tibet, to make Tibetans a minority in Lhasa.

Indo-China relations of the last 50 years show how India remains caught
in the web of Chinese realist policies. It is evidently no longer wise
for Indian policy-makers to downplay the Tibetan factor fearing an
increase in tensions with Beijing. For Chinese policies suggest that
Tibet is central in their strategies vis-a-vis India. Making Tibet an
integral part of China, for instance, gives Beijing a lot more room to
claim Indian territories and to try to settle the thorny border dispute
with the help of Tibetan documents. The question is, as an old world
slips away in Tibet, can India find the political will to revise its policy?

CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665
Developed by plank