Join our Mailing List

"On my part, I remain committed to the process of dialogue. It is my firm belief that dialogue and a willingness to look with honesty and clarity at the reality of Tibet can lead us to a viable solution."

The Value Of Freedom, The Ugliness of Censorship: Google, the UFC, and China

March 29, 2010

Josh Schrei
Marketing Director, Strategist, Producer, Writer, Critic, Activist
Huffington Post, March 26, 2010

UFC President Dana White isn't exactly going to win any PC awards anytime
soon. The notorious spokesman for the rapidly-growing full contact martial
arts empire is known for his tendency to speak first and think later. In one
famously public tirade, White went ballistic on journalist Lorretta Hunt,
calling her a "bitch" and a "moron" and labeling one of her sources both a
derogatory term for homosexual and a derogatory term for female genitalia,

Apparently however, White's predilection for free expression is not
something that he values in those who work for him. Hence his decision to
remove welterweight contender Dan Hardy's Tibetan language tattoo from all
promotions for the upcoming UFC 111 fight, in order to not offend the
Chinese government.

"I'm trying to get into China. I don't need anti-Chinese government stuff on
my fighters" said White, eloquent as always.

Leaving aside the fact that there is in fact no "anti-Chinese government
stuff" in the tattoo, which is an apolitical Buddhist prayer, White's
statement actually deserves a little more analysis than it has been getting.
Basically, in true Dana White fashion, the statement cuts to the heart of
what every major corporation over the last decade and a half has been saying
about China behind closed doors but rarely has the cojones to say publicly:
That the potential dollars to be gained from access to the Chinese market is
worth compromising our own values -- particularly that of free speech.

Amazingly, the idea is so commonplace that it barely raises an eyebrow
anymore. But it is worth asking: In what world exactly, Mr. White, is it OK
to condone censorship and violate free speech in order to make a buck?

The Chinese government, in forwarding its political agenda through
harassment and intimidation, is relying on exactly this type of behavior
from corporate heads and media moguls like Dana White. Eventually, they are
banking on the fact that they will not even have to ask their government and
corporate partners to do things like un-invite "controversial" speakers like
the Dalai Lama, or cut academic references to Tibet in order to not be
"offensive." A government that can influence and rule by proxy is a strong
government indeed, and so, if China's agenda is fulfilled, the rewriting of
Tibet, its history, and its culture and the gradual elimination of all
things Tibetan (aka "offensive) will be carried out not just by the PRC, but
by all of us. And Dana White has just helped "us" along the way.

In a world where values spread along the currents of communication, it has
always been commonplace for business leaders to say to Tibet activists that
open trade with China will result in a loosening of China's restrictions on
free speech, that the values of democracy and freedom will be alchemically
infused into the Chinese system, that we will "change" China... Our response
has always been the same: "We're not changing China, China's changing us."

This week, finally, an American corporation stood up to the fossils in
Beijing who think that throwing writers and free thinkers in jail for their
political views still has a place in the 21st century. Google followed
through on their promise to deliver uncensored search results in China and,
as a consequence, they are on their way out. Shortly thereafter,
and network solutions, in response to the Chinese government's brazen
attempts to gain information on everyone who registers a domain in China,
announced that they will no longer be registering .cn domain names.

In response, the Chinese government has done what it does best -- sought to
control the story and punish any malcontents. The Washington Post yesterday
published a list of criteria, handed down from the Chinese censors to
domestic sites and blogs, for how to correctly report on the google

It forbids mention of the "google topic" on blogs. It insists that only the
approved state language be used. And of course, it requires that anyone who
comments inappropriately, any local or national news site that does not
follow protocol, anyone who veers from the handed down official state
version of events, be reported on. If you know China, you have a pretty good
idea what happens after they are reported on.

I encourage Dana White and his slightly less verbose corporate counterparts
to take a nice long look at this list. I suggest they really think about it
for a minute and ask themselves if this type of Orwellian witchery is really
something they want to have a hand in.

To answer my own question to Mr. White: Its never OK, Dana. Ever. Doctoring
photos to tell a different version of the truth is simply not OK. Stalin did
it regularly. The Chinese state media does it. FOX News even occasionally
does it. Its not OK, and doing it because you want to make a buck does not
excuse it. In fact it makes all the slimier.

Today its wiping away harmless Tibetan language tattoos. Where exactly does
that type of thinking lead tomorrow? We know where it leads. Once a decision
is made that it is acceptable to alter history, to tell a different story,
to tell people not to use certain words or teach certain concepts, there is
only one place that leads, and it is not a place most of us on the people's
side of the equation want to go.

The internet is a fitting battleground for the clash of two contrasting
worldviews. In this world, there are those who seek to speak freely and
those who seek to deny that right. The question for a long time has been who
in this battle will gain the upper hand. The answer is no more clear, but at
least now the side that's right has some new champions. And one very vocal
turncoat. Look it up, Dana.

Follow Josh Schrei on Twitter:
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665
Developed by plank