Join our Mailing List

"I believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. It is the foundation for world peace."

The indispensable incarnation

January 10, 2011

Talk of the Dalai Lama’s “retirement” shows how much Tibet still needs
him. Yet so does China

Banyan

Jan 6th 2011 | from PRINT EDITION

ENTHRONED in a maroon and saffron pavilion, the 14th Dalai Lama chuckled
often as he preached to the football stadium, though his text was not
taken from the jolly slogan behind him: “Play soccer for world peace”.
Ringed by snowcapped Himalayan peaks in Gangtok, capital of the Indian
state of Sikkim, which borders Tibet, tens of thousands basked in
midwinter sunshine-local Sikkimese of Nepali and ethnic-Tibetan descent,
visitors and, of course, Tibetan exiles. The Dalai Lama may exaggerate a
bit when he says that 99% of Tibetans trust him. But not by much. So his
recent talk of “retirement” has unnerved many.

In November he said he was seriously thinking of retiring. An election
in 2001 for his government-in-exile had already ended the 400-year
tradition of Dalai Lamas as both spiritual and political leaders. After
an election in March this year, he would discuss with the new parliament
when to give up his remaining “temporal” role. He expected to retire in
the “next few months”.

The Dalai Lama has long stressed his work not as a political leader but
as a scholar and guardian of the Buddhist tradition he embodies. In
Gangtok he attended a seminar on spirituality and science. His lecture
on the soccer pitch was on a rather abstruse commentary by a second- or
third-century Indian philosopher, Nagarjuna (“The form particle does not
produce sense-consciousness because it transcends the senses.”). The
Dalai Lama turned it into an accessible sermon on how to live your life.

Politics, however, will not let Tibet’s spiritual leader go. His
presence in Sikkim was in itself a measured gesture of Indian defiance
towards China. India annexed the former kingdom in 1975. China long
refused to recognise Sikkim’s incorporation into India, though since
2004 Chinese maps have shown it as an Indian state, and in 2006 a modest
border trade began. The Dalai Lama’s eight-day tour of Sikkim was
pointedly timed to come just after Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister,
had been in Delhi, discussing how to improve ties. Tibet remains one of
the strains. The Dalai Lama, with some 100,000 followers, has made his
home in India since fleeing Lhasa, Tibet’s capital, in 1959.

Those exiles, and another 6m Tibetans under Chinese rule, make it
impossible for the Dalai Lama to quit politics altogether. He remains
the only Tibetan they can trust to marshal the international sympathy
that keeps their cause alive. Yet China’s refusal to talk seriously to
his representatives about the future of Tibet seems perverse. For over
20 years he has demanded not the independence many Tibetans crave, but
greater autonomy. Probably he alone could make many Tibetans accept
this. Moreover, he is a pacifist. China wrongly blamed him for the
ferocious ethnic attacks on Han Chinese in riots in Lhasa, in 2008.
Without his restraining influence, violence would have been far more
frequent.

For China, however, the solution to its Tibetan problem is the end of
the 14th Dalai Lama. It may be right that when he retires or dies-and
though in rude health, he will turn 76 this year-the Tibetan cause will
suffer a terminal blow. The Dalai Lama’s reincarnation (if any, for the
14th says this is an open question) may well be contested, like that of
another senior lama, the Panchen. The tenth Panchen died in 1989. Two
children were identified as the 11th, one recognised by the Dalai Lama
and most Tibetans, the other by China. The “Tibetan” Panchen vanished
from view.

Even an undisputed Dalai Lama would for decades be too young for a
political role. In the interim, many Tibetans expect much of another
incarnate Buddha, the Karmapa Lama. In this case there is a 17th
incarnation, Ogyen Trinley Dorje, who is recognised by both the Dalai
Lama and the Chinese government. The school of Tibetan Buddhism he heads
has just been celebrating its 900th anniversary in India at Bodh Gaya,
site of the bodhi tree under which the Buddha attained enlightenment. So
the Karmapas’ lineage is even longer than the Dalai Lamas’. Ogyen
Trinley, just 25, is an impressive and engaging figure, who has
inherited a big foreign following.

He has two problems, however. Yet again, the incarnation is contested,
with a rival candidate, also in India, and some fishiness about the
identification of the infant Ogyen Trinley. Second, India is suspicious
of him. Born in Tibet itself and feted in his youth by the Chinese
authorities, he made a dramatic flight to India 11 years ago. Some fear
China connived in his escape, hoping to sow discord among exiled
Tibetans. That has been the effect, if not the intention. The Karmapas’
seat-in-exile, at Rumtek near Gangtok, has seen fisticuffs between
supporters of the rival claimants. And the Indian government’s refusal
to allow Ogyen Trinley to enter Sikkim has become a political issue: the
state is littered with posters demanding he be allowed in.

In a ceremony for the winter solstice at the mountaintop monastery of
Rumtek itself, drums throb, horns and conches low mournfully, and monks
led by a cleric in elaborate robes and a huge black hat consign an
offering to the bonfire. But they are not many, and on hand to watch are
only a few tourists and the armed Indian soldiers who patrol the place.
The Karmapas’ home in exile is in a depression.

A job for life

China may calculate that, after the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan exile
movement will lose itself in infighting. But that is all the more reason
to deal with him. China’s control of Tibet is not in doubt. What it
lacks is the acquiescence of Tibetans. The Dalai Lama offers the best
chance of reconciliation. Three weeks after his “retirement” remarks,
the simple monk clarified his position. He had only, he said, been
referring to some ceremonial functions-signing documents and so on. Like
every Tibetan, he has a responsibility he may not shirk. Talk of his
standing down, he said, had caused “anxiety” and “confusion”, including
inside Tibet.
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665   ctcoffice@tibet.ca
Developed by plank