Join our Mailing List

"On my part, I remain committed to the process of dialogue. It is my firm belief that dialogue and a willingness to look with honesty and clarity at the reality of Tibet can lead us to a viable solution."

Dalai Lama Won’t Stop Tibet Protests

March 17, 2008

By SOMINI SENGUPTA and HARI KUMAR
The New York Times
March 16, 2008

MCLEODGANJ, India — The Dalai Lama said Sunday that he would not
instruct his followers inside Tibet to surrender before Chinese
authorities, and he described feeling “helpless” in preventing what he
feared could be an imminent blood bath.

“I do feel helpless,” he said in response to a question at a
wide-ranging, emotionally charged news conference here in what has
served as the headquarters of the Tibetan government in exile for nearly
40 years. “I feel very sad, very serious, very anxious. Cannot do anything,”

His aides said they had received reports from Tibet of 80 killings on
Thursday and Friday alone, in and around the Tibetan capital, Lhasa,
including 26 slain just outside a prison called Drapchi. Chinese state
media has reported 10 deaths and characterized most of them as
shopkeepers ”burned to death” during protests.

Tibetan exiles here said they had also received news of at least two
Buddhist monks who set themselves on fire as an act of protest; that
claim could not be independently confirmed.

For the second straight day on Sunday, protests spread into different
Tibetan regions of China. Buddhist monks and police reportedly clashed
in a Tibetan region of Sichuan Province. A crowd of 200 Tibetan
protesters burned down a local police station, news agencies reported.

One witness said a police officer was killed in the confrontation. But
the India-based Tibet Center for Human Rights and Democracy reported
that the police in the region had killed at least seven Tibetan protesters.

The Dalai Lama, who heads the government in exile and serves as the
spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, called Sunday for an independent
international inquiry into the recent violence.

He endorsed the right to peaceful protest, called violence an “act of
suicide,” and accused Beijing of carrying out “a rule of terror.”

Asked if he could stop Tibetan protesters from flouting Beijing’s
deadline to surrender by midnight on Monday, the Dalai Lama, 72, replied
swiftly: “I have no such power.”

He said he had received a call on Saturday from Tibet. “‘Please don’t
ask us to stop,’” was the caller’s request. The Dalai Lama promised he
would not, even though he said he expected the Chinese authorities to
put down the protests with force.

“Now we really need miracle power,” he said, and then laughed. “But
miracle seems unrealistic.”

As he entertained questions for over an hour here inside a temple in the
lap of snow-capped Himalayas, the limits of his influence, and even his
“middle path” message of freedom for Tibetans, rather than total
independence for Tibet, came into sharp relief, as thousands of mostly
young Tibetan exiles raised a chorus of stridently anti-Chinese slogans
and called for secession.

“We the young people feel independence is our birthright,” said Dolma
Choephel, 34, a social worker active with the Tibetan Youth Congress and
who gathered Sunday morning at a demonstration outside the gates of the
main town temple. “We understand the limitations of the Dalai Lama’s
approach. What we got after six rounds of talks — this violence?” She
was referring to the six negotiating sessions between the Dalai Lama and
Chinese authorities since 2002.

Just behind where Ms. Choephel stood, Buddhist monks began a hunger
strike. Protesters laid down Chinese flags on the road, inviting cars
and pedestrians to trample on them. Later, thousands streamed down the
hill, to Dharamsala town, the largest Tibetan settlement in India. Many
of them had painted their faces with the colors of the Tibetan flag.
“Long live the Dalai Lama,” they chanted, which made it plain that
despite their far more radical calls, they remained loyal to his
spiritual leadership.

Late Sunday evening, candles were lit on window sills and balconies
across these hills. Tibetan-owned shops were closed in solidarity with
the demonstrations across the border.

The Indian authorities, meanwhile, found themselves in an uncomfortable
diplomatic spot. The Indian police earlier last week had arrested a
group of demonstrators who vowed to walk roughly 900 miles from here to
Lhasa, but allowed a second group to set off Saturday morning unimpeded.

India has hosted Tibetan refugees since the Dalai Lama’s exodus in 1959,
but on condition that they not protest against Chinese government on
Indian soil. New Delhi’s efforts to warm up to Beijing in recent years
has made the Tibet issue an exceptionally tricky matter. The Dalai Lama,
while acknowledging Indian hospitality to Tibetan refugees — there are
an estimated 130,000 Tibetans in India — described the official
government position on Tibet as “overcautious.”

A young Tibetan monk was less circumspect about government restrictions
on the proposed march from India to Tibet. After all, said Tenzin
Damchoe, the Indian-born child of Tibetan refugees, Tibetans had learned
the art of the peaceful protest march from Gandhi. “It’s a little bit
disgrace,” Mr. Damchoe, 30, said.

As for the revolt inside Tibet, he said he could only imagine the worst.
“They crushed their own people,” he said of the Chinese response to the
Tianemen Square pro-democracy protests in 1989. “There’s no doubt they
will crush the Tibetan people.”

The Dalai Lama, for his part, seemed unfazed about the dissent among
Tibetans over full independence versus greater autonomy. Even his elder
brother, he recalled, had admonished him many years ago for not
advocating independence from China. “ ‘My dear younger brother, the
Dalai Lama,’ ” his brother told him. “ ‘You sold out the Tibetan
legitimate right. Like that.’ ”

The Dalai Lama described dissent as “a healthy sign of our commitment to
democracy, open society.”

Chuckling, he added that the idea might come as “a surprise to our
Chinese brothers and sisters.”

He described himself as a Marxist Buddhist, quoted Mao Tse Tung’s
endorsement of dissent in the party, and blamed local Communist Party
officials inside Tibet, rather than the party leadership in Beijing, for
what he called the rise of government repression against Tibetan
Buddhists in the last couple of years.

He accused Chinese officials of resorting only to force when confronted
with a crisis. “They have no experience how to deal with problems
through talk, only suppress,” he said.

Asked several times whether he endorsed the protests, which had at times
had turned violent over the last week, the Dalai Lama said Tibetans were
entitled to air their grievances peacefully. “Protest, peaceful way,
express their deep resentment is a right,” he said.

He said he was aware that the Chinese government blamed him for
fomenting rebellion. “I’m happy they found some scapegoat,” he said, in
half-jest, and then described what he said were deep-rooted grievances.

“Whether the Chinese government admits it or not, there is a problem.
The problem is a nation with ancient cultural heritage is actually
facing serious dangers,” he said. “Whether intentionally or
unintentionally, some kind of cultural genocide is taking place.”

He maintained that he was not calling for secession from China “in terms
of material development is concerned.” “We get much benefits,” from
being a part of China, as he put it and said he could endorse only
nonviolent protest. He said he remained supportive of China’s hosting of
the Olympic Games, but called on the international community to exercise
its “moral responsibility” to remind Beijing about human rights.

Jim Yardley contributed reporting from Beijing.
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665   ctcoffice@tibet.ca
Developed by plank