Join our Mailing List

"I believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. It is the foundation for world peace."

China bends on Taiwan, why not Tibet?

April 20, 2008

If Beijing can talk with Taiwan about ties, it can talk with the Dalai
Lama about Tibet's future.

Christian Science Monitor
April 17, 2008

By refusing to talk to Tibet's Dalai Lama, China has set itself up for
yet another protest of the Olympic torch run, this time in India. But in
contrast, China's top leader held talks last Saturday with Taiwan's
incoming vice president. Does that receptivity to negotiations give hope
to Tibetans?

That depends on whether Beijing follows up on its breakthrough talks and
apparent new goodwill with Taiwan, a "breakaway" island it regards as an
official region of China as much as landlocked Tibet is in reality.

The Dalai Lama seeks only full autonomy for his people within Chinese
rule while the newly elected leaders of Taiwan are happy with the
island's ambiguous status as de facto independent but still officially
part of "one China" (someday). Taiwan's president-elect, Ma Ying-jeou of
the Nationalist Party, plans closer economic ties with the mainland and,
unlike outgoing President Chen Shui-bian, won't agitate Beijing with
moves toward official independence.

The surprise high-level talks between Taiwan and China may be Beijing's
way to reward Taiwan's voters for bringing back Nationalist rule and the
old policy which leaves "the question" of the island's status to future
generations. (Note the irony of a dictatorship rewarding a democracy.)
Now, China should be equally generous with the Dalai Lama, who has
dropped his demand for Tibetan independence – unlike many younger
Tibetans – and reward him by opening talks. Many countries seek such a
move, and a few leaders may boycott the opening of the Beijing Olympics
if such talks don't take place.

But China's leaders don't need foreign pressure to see the wisdom of
such a step. The native Buddhists of Tibet, after all, are far different
from China's dominant ethnic Han people in culture, religion, and
ethnicity than are the 23 million people of Taiwan. In fact, the
eruption of Han nationalism against Tibetans after the recent protests
shows just how difficult it would be to integrate Tibet into China. And
Beijing's arguments for any historic control of this Himalayan area
remain weak.

China's slight openness with Taiwan could merely be pre-Olympic
posturing to save face after its Tibetan debacle. In his meeting with
Taiwan's vice president-elect, Vincent Siew, who takes office May 22,
Chinese President Hu Jintao didn't promise more such talks, although he
did point to granting tourist visas and direct flights across the strait.

Much more needs to be done by Beijing to show a new attitude. Mr. Siew
was not allowed into China for the talks as an elected representative
but only with a "Taiwanese compatriot travel document." Such slaps in
the face must end, and China can start by allowing Taiwan to attend the
May 19 World Health Assembly and join the World Health Organization. It
can also let Taiwan send a high official to this year's Asia Pacific
Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit meeting.

As Siew told Mr. Hu, the two sides should "face reality, envision the
future, put aside differences, and pursue a win-win situation." And if
China has peaceful intent for eventual reunification with the island, it
can also remove the hundreds of missiles aimed at Taiwan.

It is in China's self-interest in stability to treat both Tibet and
Taiwan similarly.
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665   ctcoffice@tibet.ca
Developed by plank