Join our Mailing List

"For a happier, more stable and civilized future, each of us must develop a sincere, warm-hearted feeling of brotherhood and sisterhood."

In Beijing, do splashy protests pay dividends?

August 17, 2008

Foreign pro-Tibet activists are detained by Chinese police and
security guards after they staged a protest near the main Olympics
venue in Beijing Wednesday, Aug. 13.
Some activists say wacky antics will lead to more openness in China.
Others urge less confrontational tactics.
By Mark Magnier, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
Los Angeles Times
Associated Press/Kyodo News
August 14, 2008

BEIJING -- The eight foreigners detained Wednesday near the Olympic
Village after unfurling a "Free Tibet" banner followed pole sitters,
pirate radio jocks and slogan-shouting Christian activists in finding
holes through China's security operation to challenge its human
rights policies.

The question is whether their protests will make any difference.

In the short term, such stunts do little more than gain publicity for
their causes. Given the government's skill at controlling
information, their message is unlikely to reach many Chinese citizens.

And though some human rights activists urge using quieter means to
press for change, China is more sensitive to foreign pressure than it
acknowledges. Some say wacky antics can heighten global attention
that eventually could lead to greater openness.

Students for a Free Tibet, which organized Wednesday's event at which
the activists chained themselves to bicycles, started planning a
series of Olympics protests months ago, said Lhadon Tethong, the New
York-based group's executive director. A British journalist also was
briefly detained, reportedly because police mistook him for a
protester. China has been particularly sensitive about Tibet protests
since riots erupted across the Tibetan plateau in March.

Tethong said her group believes that engaging in discussions with
China doesn't work. "The idea that China is going to naturally move
to a more open society absolutely isn't true," she said.

Two days before the opening ceremony last week, the group carried out
a complex action timed for maximum impact. Two Britons and two
Americans slipped into China in early August on tourist visas,
careful they weren't on any Chinese watch list.

The four spent a few days casing the area around Beijing's National
Stadium. Then at 5:15 a.m. on Aug. 6, two members quickly assembled
climbing equipment and ascended halfway up 120-foot electricity
pylons on a pair of slings.

Pro-Tibet activist Phil Bartell, a tattoo artist from Boulder, Colo.,
said he practiced climbing for months. Once aloft, he and fellow
activist Iain Thom unfurled "Free Tibet" banners as two female
colleagues ran interference below.

When police arrived, they seemed unsure what to do, Bartell said. The
activists blogged and conducted interviews aloft on cellphones.
Eventually, a cherry picker and firetruck appeared and the group
surrendered. They were interrogated for eight hours, had their visas
revoked and were deported.

Paris-based Reporters Without Borders' bid to take over Chinese radio
frequency last week was an embarrassing security lapse for the
government in Beijing.

Over several weeks, the media group smuggled tiny transmitters into
China, then crafted antennas from climbing equipment, said Vincent
Brossel, the group's Asia head. On the morning of the opening
ceremony, several activists turned on the mini transmitters
simultaneously and broadcast a call for free speech. Aware police
could easily track them, they only broadcast for 20 minutes before
ditching the equipment and slipping out of China.

Others argue that less confrontational methods are more effective.

"We try and build up a relationship that involves an ongoing dialogue
rather than a one-off slap in the face," said Joshua Rosenzweig, Hong
Kong-based research manager with the Dui Hua Foundation, which works
for the release of Chinese political prisoners.

But there's no easy answer, Rosenzweig said, adding that Dui Hua's
website was blocked recently while those of more confrontational
groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch were not.

Li Datong, former editor of the influential publication Freezing
Point, said foreign activists would be more effective if they helped
bring about a dialogue among Chinese officials, experts and the public.

"This will take a long time, but is more useful," he said. "The
government isn't stupid, but many of their actions come from fear
that giving people rights will undermine its rule."

Foreigners generally face little more than deportation for
demonstrating. Chinese protesters face persecution, prison or worse,
which may explain why few of them have grabbed the spotlight in
recent days. Many ordinary Chinese also are feeling defensive,
convinced that outside protesters are trying to keep China down and
spoil the Olympics.

Months ago, Beijing recognized it couldn't stop every protester among
its 450,000 foreign Olympic visitors. "The world is big, and there
are various birds in the forest," Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang
told reporters, adding that the government expected activist groups
to distort the truth.

Beijing is slowly becoming more tolerant of protests, some analysts
said, although they still are seen as a hostile act rather than a
form of expression.

"What foreign protesters do won't have much effect," said Lin Zhe,
professor at the Communist Party's Central Party School. "The
government won't collapse. People are getting more used to them."

Though Beijing often denies that foreign pressure works,
international criticism prompted it to meet with representatives of
the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, after long
vilifying him, said University of Chicago professor Dali Yang.

And calls by celebrities, including actress Mia Farrow, to boycott
the Games over China's Darfur policy prompted Beijing to send
peacekeepers to the region and distance itself modestly from the
Sudanese government, he added.

"What would happen to Darfur if the humanitarian community had not
raised its voice?" Farrow said by telephone from Chad.

With 20,000 journalists in town, Chinese police have been
uncharacteristically lenient toward foreign protesters.

When three American Christians appeared in Tiananmen Square last
week, including antiabortion activist Rev. Patrick Mahoney, they were
allowed to rail against China's population policy, repression of the
banned Falun Gong spiritual group and the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown
for nearly an hour before being led away.

When they returned the next day, police surrounded them and dragged
them away. They were questioned for nine hours, with a break for
takeout food. "I've had wild moments before, but never eating
Kentucky Fried Chicken while being interrogated," Mahoney said. "But
they had no toilet paper, so the KFC napkins were welcome."

After a fight over who would pay for the airfare back to the U.S. --
the Chinese ultimately did -- the group was deported.

Perhaps the most bizarre protest recently came from Pastor E. Perez
Romero of La Puente's Hacienda Christian Fellowship, who decided to
paint hotel rooms.

Romero hatched the plan years ago, then practiced drawing murals near
his home, said Tony Thomas, his spokesman.

The pastor pre-booked rooms in four Beijing hotels. But he faced
tight security at two of them, including a search by police who
questioned him about the paint. This limited his work to two rooms.

As security tightened, he went into hiding. Friends said he planned
to surrender and pay any damages after the Games. "Relative to the
injuries Christians suffer being beaten and tortured, this is
actually a minor cost," Thomas said.

Falun Gong, the spiritual group many expected to be the most
aggressive protesters during the Olympics, hasn't been heard from
yet. John Li, president of the Caltech Falun Gong Club, said the
organization has no protest plans, although individuals will probably
do something as part of their long-term struggle.

"We've been fighting with the Communist Party like a mouse and cat,"
Li said. "The Olympics are a good opportunity for all these groups to
help improve human rights in China."

mark.magnier@latimes.com

CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665   ctcoffice@tibet.ca
Developed by plank