Join our Mailing List

"On my part, I remain committed to the process of dialogue. It is my firm belief that dialogue and a willingness to look with honesty and clarity at the reality of Tibet can lead us to a viable solution."

Loosing Distinction Between a ‘Traitor’ and Patriots: By Vijay Kranti

December 31, 2009

Phayul [Wednesday, December 30, 2009 15:53]

One funny thing that has always intrigued me regarding Tibet is the laid
back attitude of the Lord Chamberlain in Lhasa in 1950 when the radio
message from Lhalu Tsewang Dorje, the Governor General of Eastern Tibet
arrived him in the form of a telegram. It was a desperate SOS from the
Governor to the ruling caretaker Regent’s Council. He was asking for
advice and fresh Army back up from Lhasa government as he feared that
Tibet was going to be attacked by the Chinese Army any moment. The Lord
Chamberlain read it and put it aside with the instructions to keep it on
hold until the Regent and his large contingent of courtiers had finished
their traditional annual picnic. This was Tibet where an annual picnic
had a better place in the priority list of a nation’s leadership as
compared to the national security.

What followed was no less funny either. The Governor General Lhalu was
replaced by Ngabo Ngawang Jigme, an energetic minister from Lhasa who
was known for not being so ‘fussy’ and ‘desperate’ like Lhalu – more so
in matters related to China. Instead of taking commands from the Lhasa
government the new Governor decided on his own to ‘negotiate’ with the
Chinese generals. Ngabo not only deliberately deprived the radio
facility to the frontier posts to stop any ‘bad’ news from reaching
Lhasa, he quietly let the PLA massacre the entire force of Tibetan Army
men at the frontier posts. At home in Chamdo he disbanded the local
armed volunteer groups, blasted the Tibetan Army’s ammunition depot and
ran back to Lhasa without giving any fight to the PLA who just walked in
to overwhelm Chamdo.

In early 1951 at Lhasa when 16-year old Dalai Lama was taken away to a
safe place near Indian border in South, Ngabo practically appointed
himself as the head of Tibetan delegation to Beijing for negotiations
with the Chinese government. Though his delegation was not given any
authority to sign any papers on behalf of the Lhasa government, Ngabo
put his signatures on a ‘treaty’ between China and Tibet to ‘formally
merge’ Tibet into China. Thus, in one stroke of signature of this
obliging ‘charming young man’, Tibet lost its centuries old freedom and
became a permanent colony of China on May 23, 1951.

It is not surprising that Ngapo was profusely rewarded by the ‘Central’
government of China for his ‘patriotic’ services to the great Chinese
‘motherland’. In March 1959 when Dalai Lama escaped to India to become a
refugee following a failed uprising of Tibetan masses against occupying
Chinese forces, Ngapo used choicest rebukes against his escaping former
ruler to demonstrate his loyalty to his Chinese masters. This process of
winning brownie points from his colonial communist masters continued
till December 23rd this year when he died as the most beloved Tibetan
stooge of China at the age of 99 in a comfortable hospital in Beijing.

It is understandable that the Central Committee of the Communist Party
of China (CPC) should have paid its tributes to the dead Ngabo Ngawang
Jigme as “a great patriot, renowned social activist, good son of Tibetan
people, outstanding leader of China’s ethnic work and a CLOSE FRIEND of
CPC.” China’s state controlled news agency Xinhua conveyed the Beijing
rulers’ tributes to this collaborator by praising him for “ushering in
major milestones in Tibet, such as the democratic reforms and the
founding of the Autonomous Region of Tibet (TAR).” This praise from his
colonial masters on account of his role in founding of TAR becomes more
meaningful and revealing today when we find Beijing, perpetually facing
international pressure on Tibet, trying desperately to present TAR as
the ‘real Tibet’. TAR has been always handy in Beijing’s attempts to
deflect world community’s attention from rest of two thirds of original
Tibet which China has already gobbled up and digested in adjoining
Chinese provinces of Yunnan, Sichuan, Gansu and Qinghai. This profuse
expression of love and admiration from a colonial master to an obliging
native collaborator is understandable.

However, what is not understandable is the official tribute from the
exiled Tibetan government in Dharamsala who eulogized dead Ngabo as
“Honest and Patriotic who always spoke truth even under the most trying
and difficult circumstances”. In its enthusiasm to express its suddenly
found admiration for a man like Ngabo the Kashag, (Tibetan Cabinet) the
highest executive forum of the ‘government in exile’, has gone on record
to say that it “remembers his life-long contributions and mourns his
demise.” One wishes that the Kashag should have specifically mentioned
those ‘contributions’ of Ngabo which the new generation of Tibetans
should emulate in order to be finally decorated as “Honest and
Patriotic” by its leaders?

The Kashag statement refers to some meetings between Ngabo and visiting
Tibetan representatives of Dharamsala in which he is supposed to have
claimed that he had expressed his frank opinions to Chinese Premier Zhou
Enlai and other leaders on issues like real size of Tibet, the 17-point
agreement and the recognition of the 14th (present) Dalai Lama. It
sounds like rehabilitating a ‘traitor’ as a new ‘hero’ of the Tibetan
nation.

In its extra ordinary obituary statement, the Kashag has surprisingly
gone to the extent of equating Ngabo with late 10th Panchen Lama who,
unlike Ngabo, had the courage to confront Beijing leaders publicly head
on. Despite having been brought up under Beijing’s care since his
childhood, Panchen Lama demonstrated the courage of condemning Chinese
ruthlessness in occupied Tibet through a brave 70 thousand character
long letter that he had addressed to Chairman Mao. (As a consequence he
was deprived of his post as a Vice Chairman of CPCC and condemned to a
20 year long labour camp punishment. Following his release, he is
believed to have been murdered by Beijing agents when he spoke publicly
against Beijing rule on Tibet in early 1980s.)

It is surprising to note that the Kashag has found it praiseworthy that
Ngabo took 40 years to call upon the Central Government to implement
17-point agreement….” which he himself had signed. Interestingly, he
never repeated this demand till he died 18 years later.

Tibetan government can surely draw some solace from the Tibetan
‘tradition’ of not saying unpleasant things about a dead person – but
its attempt to heap praise on one of the worst known ‘traitors’ in
Tibetan history has left most exiled Tibetans confused and dumb stuck.
They fail to understand why a man, who collaborated all his life with
occupying Chinese masters in strengthening their colonial grip on his
country Tibet, should be ‘remembered for his life-long contributions…’?
This praise of a ‘Mir Jafar’ (the legendry traitor Indian Mughal king
who collaborated with the East India Company to pave way for its
colonial rule in India) is an insult to those innumerable brave Tibetans
living inside occupied Tibet who laid their lives or who underwent
horrible experiences to fight and undo the sins of men like Ngabo.

And finally, this gesture of the Tibetan leadership has left thousands
of friends of Tibet like me bewildered. We are at loss to decide whether
a community, who lacks even the elementary wisdom of distinguishing
between its traitors and patriots, really deserve our support.

Observers like me have known Prof. Samdhong Rimpoche, the present leader
of the Kashag, as one of the most outstanding leaders of present day
Tibet. With my personal deep faith in his wisdom, patriotism and
capability of taking difficult decisions, I am sure he will probe the
possibilities of a second thought on this statement to withdraw it or
reissue it after due amendments. This wisdom of correcting a historic
mistake in its bud will not only save the Tibetan nation from the fall
outs of an avoidable blunder, it will also underline the magnanimity of
this monk statesman. And, above all, such a brave step will pave way for
many more healthy practices in a democratic system which is still in its
nascent stage and has to go a long way towards a deep rooted and matured
democracy.

The writer is a veteran Indian journalist and a photographer who has had
association with the Tibetan community for more than three decades. He
has documented the exile Tibetan community's journey through his lens.
He lives in Delhi.
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665   ctcoffice@tibet.ca
Developed by plank