Join our Mailing List

"I believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. It is the foundation for world peace."

Taiwan must avoid becoming a new Tibet By Chow Mei-li

April 4, 2010

Friday, Apr 02, 2010
Taipei Times

Why is it that the Dalai Lama, the spiritual and political leader of the
Tibetan people, does not live in Tibet? Many people are aware that the Dalai
Lama lives in exile and that he has done so for 51 years, but surprisingly
few in Taiwan are familiar with the story of why he was forced to flee 51
years ago.

Recently, a Chinese-­language version of the Dalai Lama's autobiography My
Land and My People was published in Taiwan and it is an absolute must for
anyone curious about that time in history. More importantly, the book also
provides many lessons for Taiwan today as it faces the formidable challenge
of rapprochement with China.

What happened in Tibet half a century ago? Why did the country not enjoy
peace after signing a "peace agreement" with the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP), a document that is better known as the Seventeen-Point Agreement, in
1951?

Why did Tibet's capital, Lhasa, later erupt into mass riots and why was the
Dalai Lama forced to flee his homeland?

The Seventeen-Point Agreement not only failed to facilitate a sustainable
peace, it resulted in exile for many, with more than 100,000 people losing
their homes and thousands more their lives.

In My Land and My People, the Dalai Lama says that when he accepted an
invitation from India to take part in the 2,500th Buddha birthday
celebrations in 1956, he did not want to return to Tibet.

However, then-Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru persuaded the first
premier of the People's Republic of China, Zhou Enlai, to personally
guarantee that the CCP would not enforce its "reforms" on the Tibetan
people.

That was the reason the Dalai Lama was willing to return to home.

However, after only a few years, the situation deteriorated so badly that he
had no choice but to flee for India.

If we look at more recent history, in 1979, when paramount leader Deng
Xiaoping  said that everything other than independence was open for
discussion, the Dalai Lama decided to start negotiations with the CCP for
the welfare of his 6 million countrymen in Tibet.

To that end he asked for a high degree of autonomy and gave up on ever
gaining independence.

However, in 30 years of China-Tibetan talks, little of substance has been
achieved and the CCP still accuses the Dalai Lama of being a separatist.

The CCP has also not wasted time, seizing more and more land in Tibet,
encouraging "Han" Chinese immigration and promoting large-scale
sinification.

Today there are more "Han" Chinese residents in Lhasa than Tibetans and
Tibet is becoming a second Mongolia, where not even 20 percent of the
population is Mongolian.

Tibet's experience in negotiating with the CCP has been a bloody one and
this is an experience that Taiwanese must not forget in their own dealings
with China.

Some people in Taiwan propose signing a "peace agreement" with China, but
with no war between the two countries, why do we need to sign a peace
agreement?

If there is a war, how is it that the governments of Taiwan and China
continue to exchange friendly words with one another?

The lessons of history are there to be learned: A "peace agreement" with
China failed to save the Tibetan people and that is something the Taiwanese
public needs to think about long and hard.

Chow Mei-li is chairperson of the Taiwan Friends of Tibet.
Translated by Drew Cameron
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665   ctcoffice@tibet.ca
Developed by plank