Transcript: Tibet Questions raised at the British Parliament
January 14, 2008
Foreign and Commonwealth Office Human Rights (China)
House of Commons debates: Tuesday, 8 January 2008
Norman Baker (Lewes) (LD): What steps he is taking to encourage the
Chinese government to adhere to pledges it has made in respect of
human rights and press freedom, with particular reference to occupied
Tibet. [175894]
Meg Munn: We encourage the Chinese Government to fulfil their human
rights obligations across China, including in Tibet. My right hon.
Friend the Foreign Secretary raised the issue of human rights with
the Chinese Foreign Minister in December. My right hon. Friend the
Minister for the Olympics and for London raised the issue of media
freedom in November. We will raise our concerns on Tibet at the next
round of the UK-China human rights dialogue in Beijing later this month.
Norman Baker: The Chinese have promised media freedom for foreign
journalists in China, but have restricted it even more in occupied
Tibet. They promised to give the Red Cross access to prisons in
China, but exempted Tibet. They promised religious freedom, but
effectively have martial law in monasteries. Is not the reality that
the Chinese sign lots of bits of paper about Tibet, but do absolutely
nothing about it?
Meg Munn: We take seriously the range of human rights issues that the
hon. Gentleman raised. I know that he has a long record in relation
to Tibet and has rightly highlighted the matter on many occasions. We
pursue human rights in three ways-through high-level lobbying,
through UK-China and EU-China dialogues, and through project work on
the ground, including on issues such as the judiciary, torture, the
death penalty and minority rights.
Mr. Jim McGovern (Dundee, West) (Lab): It is heartening that China
has made pledges to uphold human rights. However, it is difficult to
equate such pledges with China's continuing offer of no-strings aid,
(8 Jan 2008: Column 144) which has emboldened some unsavoury
Governments and allowed them to ignore calls for reform. Can the
Minister assure the House that the Government will continue to do all
in their power to encourage China to conditionalise the aid that it
gives to some of the most despotic regimes in the world, such as the
regime in Sudan?
Meg Munn: My hon. Friend raises an important point. Our engagement
with China always focuses on human rights issues. The Prime Minister
is to visit shortly and will continue our dialogue and continue to
press on these matters.
Sir Malcolm Rifkind (Kensington and Chelsea) (Con): What is the
difference between the Chinese Government's respect for human rights
in Tibet and the Serbian Government's respect for human rights in
Kosovo that justifies a very different policy by Her Majesty's
Government?
Meg Munn: We take seriously the issues in Tibet and we raise these
matters continually at the regular dialogues. This will be the 16th
round of dialogues between the UK and China on Tibet, and on this
occasion the delegations will make a visit to Tibet to study the
situation on the ground.
Source: www.publications.parliament.uk
Meg Munn is the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign
and Commonwealth Affairs